He was to direct the new adaptation of The Hobbit (though I believe he is still at the typewriter for this project) but has since moved on the Lovecraft. From J.R.R. Tolkien to H.P. Lovecraft. Maybe he should consider R.E. Howard too?
Anyway, a quote from an interview:
"Obviously, the difference between the novella and the movie is that Lovecraft had a gift for making everything specifically ambiguous. He would say 'the leering face loaded with madness,’ or 'the evil perverse entity of unnamable'… everything was unnamable, indescribable. When you're reading you go,'Whoa!' your brain fills those spaces. For every creature, everyone has a secret mental image of what those creatures look like. It's going to be impossible to please everyone."
"I've been thinking of those monsters for twenty years. Fortunately for me no one has done monsters like the ones I'm doing. In all the movies ever made there's never been monsters like the ones we're doing. About two weeks ago we were visited by Dennis Muren. He looked at the designs, and he turned to us and said, 'No one has seen monsters like this ever.' I was like, [boyish grin] 'Yeah!' I was happy and vindicated and all that."
I'd say it sounds interesting. He at least has the intuitive understanding of Lovecraft. But will he be able to translate that effectively onto the screen? Well, only time will tell.
A bit more here...
I'm excited already :)
ReplyDeleteBut no matter what you put on the screen, won't it lose its shock value once seen? Having just finished reading this tale, i'm looking forward to the film adaptation, I just hope they leave much of the horror off-screen (which I think is more terrifying than actually seeing it)
ReplyDeleteI agree. Some of the most effective horror is what is not shown.
ReplyDeleteI'm cautiously optimistic. If there's any way to make this look right, it's with Guillermo del Toro holding James Cameron's checkbook.
ReplyDelete